Animal Project Modis Sabarmati Riverfront is not a flowing river: Gujarat HC working group

0

Gandhinagar, September 24: The High Court of Gujarat has appointed a Joint Task Force (JTF) has declared that the water body of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s favorite project, Sabarmati Riverfront, is a stagnant body of water, which has been polluted by the illegal dumping of industrial effluents in wastewater treatment plants. (STP) waters.

The Gujarat HC-incorporated JTF informed the court on Thursday that the water body on the Sabarmati River’s edge had no environmental water e-flow. “The waters of the Sabarmati riverbank have no electronic water flow and scientifically, no discharge could be allowed to be discharged into such a body of water,” said Rohit Prajapati, member of the JTF.

“The waters of the Sabarmati riverbank are in poor condition because the discharges from the sewage treatment plant are discharged into it. These treatment plants have been legally authorized by the Ahmedabad municipal company (AMC) to receive industrial effluents. “said Prajapati.

The bench of the High Court of Gujarat, composed of Judge JB Pardiwala and Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, expressed its surprise on the matter. “We want to know from the AMC how this authorization was given? We also order that all authorizations granted so far be revoked. We will pass an order on this shortly,” Judge Pardiwala said.

“The Sabarmati river is badly damaged and almost irreversible damage has been caused with a stretch of nearly 120 km of the river practically dead,” Prajapati told the court. The stretch he referred to was from the Vasna Dam to the mouth of the Arabian Sea river. It should be noted that the river stops flowing from the Vasna region to the place where the riverside is built.

The court was also surprised to learn that the AMC had authorized cooperative societies in three villages to draw water from the Sabarmati and that this water was used to produce agricultural products.

“We want this to be stopped immediately. How is this allowed? Asked Judge Pardiwala.

When the counsel of a certain Miroli Piyat Sahakari Mandli asked the court to consider this to be at stake the livelihood of the beneficiaries of the water drawn, he said: “We understand, but we cannot allow this polluted water. to reach the farms. If villages have other sources of water, they can use it for irrigation, provided it meets GPCB standards for irrigation water.

Devang Vyas, representing the Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB), argued in court that the board remained understaffed. Often officials who tried to curb polluting activities were threatened and prevented from taking action against industrial units, he added.

“These people (who prevent GPCB from performing its statutory functions) will be immediately detained under PASA and we will not tolerate such authoritarianism,” Judge Pardiwala said in response to Vyas.

Taking suo motu knowledge of the Sabarmati River pollution issue based on media reports in August, the Gujarat High Court then instituted the JTF to consider the issue and suggest appropriate recommendations to remedy the situation.

The Gujarat HC had ordered the formation of the JTF led by Prasoon Gargava, regional director of the Central Pollution Control Council and 10 other members including Deepa Gavali, director and secretary of the Gujarat Ecology Society, Professor Upendra Patel, Rohit Prajapati d A Vadodara based NGO Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, an agent of the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad and two agents of the Pollution Control Board of Gujarat.

The working group was also to include an officer from Torrent Power, a member of the police (at least the rank of deputy police commissioner) and two armed police officers, in accordance with the instructions issued by the judiciary in its decree.

(IANS / 2 days) https://www.newkerala.com/gujarat-news.php



Relax, feel better! @ https://refer.enooz.com/relaxation Look now


Source link

Share.

Leave A Reply